By the stream ye shall know them…and yourself

Increasingly it appears to me that in a choice of career or vocation or perhaps even relationships, the important thing is not the product of any particular moment, but the overall rate of flow. The significance of what you’ve just created can only be understood in the context of what is coming next. An artist has found her medium when the rate of work is steady and strong. This proves she’s  struck oil, that she is doing what she is meant to do.

This principle is embodied in the way companies are valued. The most important component of that valuation is the value of future cash flows, which is connected to growth rate, the movement, the trend: not merely the result, however excellent, of this or that particular quarter.

What is that stream of things which you can produce on a consistent basis? If you’ve found that, your interpretation of what you should do with what you’ve previously produced, your background, might change. Your goals might change. The overall goal should be to live a life where your flow of future creation can be expressed fully.

How is writing fiction like programming?

How is a paragraph or a chapter or a book of fiction anything like a program? Does it accomplish things? Or does it just sit there passively? I guess it is a kind of program. One runs it by reading it, and it programs not a computer but the mind. A much more powerful program, or at least one that operates one much more powerful hardware. Powerful? Well, flexible at least. Much more capable of ambiguity. And what is its aim? To help a person search for some piece of information or improve the mechanics of day-to-day operations? Maybe some simple non-fiction does that. Fiction is more complex. The idea here is to refine the elements of subjective experience, to change perspectives, to alter lives. To create or reveal worlds.

But why is this better than a search engine? One can use a search engine, play with it, and it does things. Does a text do the same thing? What useful thing does a text “do”? It seems so linear, so lacking in choice, so lifeless and inert and non-dynamic. Then again, maybe that depends on the reader. Maybe the text does respond to commands, but the reader has to issue them. The reader can question the text and receive answers, but the text doesn’t specify its functions explicitly. And whether any particular text responds coherently to any particular set of commands may depend on whether the author has built that functionality in, i.e. by having structured the text in the appropriate way.

The Point of Life is the Explosion of Experience Into Ideas

The next time you stub your toe or otherwise hurt yourself, take a moment to become curious about exactly what the pain is like. What exactly does it feel like? Is it stabbing? Does it radiate? Is it blunt or sharp? Does it come and go? Is it cold or hot? Does it remind you of someone, or something, or some place?

As soon as you suspend the pain in your mind, the pain immediately changes. It becomes interesting. Like Keanu Reeves might stop a bullet in the air in The Matrix, you stun the pain by paying it conscious attention and then examining it like a scientist or artist might. It becomes fascinating. And then, as you describe it, its character changes more and more. It becomes sharp, specific, and beautiful. It might still be pain, but still, even as pain, it is no longer painful in the same way. Now it is a jewel. You see within it organization, ideas, intelligence.

Through the process of reflection and then expression, we can transform pain into beauty. This is true not just of physical pain, but of all pain, and indeed, of any experience. This is the essence of human freedom and power. [Read more...]

Daily Fascinations

Shoshana Zuboff, a retired sociology professor at Harvard worked on a program called Odyssey to help retired business executives find themselves. Details here and here.

C.S. Lewis describes the deep desire all of us have to be part of an Inner Ring.

10 curses of the analytical thinker